Bibliography MA2

Arnold, K. (2000) ‘Between Explanation and Inspiration: Images in Science’. In: Ede, S. (ed) Strange and Charmed. United Kingdom: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. pp. 68-67.

Art21: Art in the Twenty-First Century. (2001) PBS Home Video. [online] At: (Accessed on 02.05.19)

Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Berg, R. (1960). ‘The Ecological Significance of Correlation Pleiades’. In: Evolution, 14(2), 171-180. [online] At: doi:10.2307/2405824 (Accessed on 02.11.18)

Bergland, R. (2008). ‘Urania’s Inversion: Emily Dickinson, Herman Melville, and the Strange History of Women Scientists in Nineteenth‐Century America’. In: Signs, 34 (1), 75-99. [online] At: (Accessed on 02.11.18)

Bickers, Wilson, S. (2007) Talking Art: Interviews with Artists Since 1976. London: Ridinghouse.

Birchall, D. and Cairns, S. (2013). ‘Curating the Digital World: Past Preconceptions, Present Problems, Possible Futures’. In:, N. Proctor & R. Cherry (eds). Silver Spring, MD: Museums and the Web. [online] At: (Accessed 13.09.19)

Blazwick, I. (2001) ‘Mark Dion’s “Tate Thames Dig”’. In: Oxford Art Journal 24, no. 2 (2001): 105-12. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.02.19)

Broadbeck, M (1968) Readings in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: The Macmillan Company

Burke, E (1757) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of Sublime and Beautiful. New York: P.F. Collier & Son

Carney, J. (1980). ‘The Hesperus and Phosphorus Puzzle’. In: Mind, 89(356), new series, 577-581. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.01.19)

Carruesco, J. (2016). ‘Choral Performance and Geometric Patterns in Epic Poetry and Iconographic Representations’. In: Peponi A. (Author) & Cazzato V. & Lardinois A. (eds.), The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual: Studies in Archaic and Classical Greek Song, vol. 1. LEIDEN; BOSTON: Brill. pp. 69-107 [online] At: (Accessed on 11.02.19)

Clarke, D. (n.d) David Clarke. [online] At: (Accessed on 15.09.18)

Colman, A. (2004) ‘ and Net.pedagogy: Introducing Internet Art to the Digital Art Curriculum.’ In: Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 61-73. [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

Cook, S. (2013). ‘On Curating New Media Art. In NOORDEGRAAF J., SABA C., LE MAÎTRE B., & HEDIGER V. (Eds.)’, In: Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. pp. 389-405 [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

Costello, D. (2007) ‘Greenberg’s Kant and the Fate of Aesthetics in Contemporary Art Theory’. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(2), 217-228. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.02.19)

Crimmins, M (1998) ‘Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference.’ In: The Philosophical Review, vol. 107, no. 1, 1998, pp. 1–47. [online] At: (Accessed 28.04.19)

Crowther, P (1982), ‘MERLEAU–PONTY: PERCEPTION INTO ART’. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 22, Issue 2, SPRING 1982, Pages 138–149 [online] At: (Accessed on 10.04.19)

Cruz, B., & Smith, N. (2013). ‘Mark Dion’s “Troubleshooting”: Empowering Students to Create and Act. Art Education’, 66(3), 29-38. [online] At: (Accessed on 22.03.19)

Davidson, D. (2001) Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Duncan, A (2000) ‘Inside – Outside – Permutation: Science and the Body in Contemporary Art’. In: Ede, S. (ed) Strange and Charmed. United Kingdom: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. pp.144-163

Ede, S. (2000) ‘The Scientist’s Mind: The Artist’s Temperament’. In: Ede, S. (ed) Strange and Charmed. United Kingdom: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. pp. 28-49

Fitch, G. (1976). ‘Are There Necessary “A Posteriori” Truths?’. In: Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 30(4), 243-247. [online] At: (Accessed on 22.03.19)

Fox, C (1980) ‘The Existential Phenomenological Alternative to Dichotomous Thought’. In: The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 3, 1980, pp. 357–379. [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

García-Encinas, M.J. (2017). ‘THE DISCOVERY THAT PHOSPHORUS IS HESPERUS: A FOLLOW-UP TO KRIPKE ON THE NECESSITY OF IDENTITY’. In: Analysis and Metaphysics, 16, 52-69. [online] At: (Accessed 03.05.19)

Garipis, S. (1999) ‘INTERNET AND PUBLIC ORDER’ In: Cyberidentities: Canadian and European Presence in Cyberspace. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. (pp. 47-54) [online] At: (Accessed on 05.04.19)

Gibbon, W. (1972). ‘Asiatic Parallels in North American Star Lore: Milky Way, Pleiades, Orion’. In: The Journal of American Folklore, 85(337), 236-247. [online] At: doi:10.2307/539498 (Accessed on 05.11.18)

Gombiner, J. (2011) ‘Carbon Footprinting the Internet’ In: Consilience, (5), 119-124. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.04.19)

Graham, B. (1999) ‘A Study of Audience Relationships with Interactive Computer-Based Visual Artworks’ In: Leonardo 32(4), 326-328. United States: The MIT Press. [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

Graham, B. (1999) ‘A Study of Audience Relationships with Interactive Computer-Based Visual Artworks’ In: Leonardo 32(4), 326-328. The MIT Press. [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

Guyer, P. (1994) ‘Kant’s Conception of Fine Art’. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 52, no. 3 (1994): 275-85. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.02.19)

Harrington, J. (1990). ‘The Moon, The Stars, and The Artist: Astronomy in the Works of Charles E. Burchfield’. In: American Art Journal, 22(2), 33-59. [online] At: doi:10.2307/1594560 (Accessed on 22.03.19)

Heidegger, M. (1990) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics [online] At: (Accessed on 05.02.19)

Heinaman, R. (1990) ‘Aristotle and the Mind-Body Problem’. In: Phronesis, 35(1), 83-102. [online] At: (Accessed on 15.04.19)

Ingold, T (2009) The Textility of Making. Cambridge: Cambridge Journal of Economics [online] At: (Accessed on 02.01.19)

Jones, J. (1984) Designing Designing. London: Phaidon Press.

Kant, I (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kemp, M and Schultz, D. (2000) ‘Us and Them, This and That, Here and There, Now and Then: Collecting, Classifying and Creating’. In: Ede, S. (ed) Strange and Charmed. United Kingdom: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. pp. 28-49

Kind, Amy (2001). ‘Putting the Image Back in Imagination’. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. pp. 85–110.

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Libaw, W. (2000) How we got to be human: subjective minds with objective bodies. United Sates: Prometheus Books

Linsky, L. (1959). ‘Hesperus and Phosphorus’. In: The Philosophical Review, 68(4), 515-518. [online] At: doi:10.2307/2182495 (Accessed on 05.01.19)

Lipkin, L. (2014) What Galileo Saw: Imagining the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cornell University Press.

Marsh, J. (2009) ‘Fieldwork: A Conversation with Mark Dion’. In: American Art, vol. 23, no. 2, 2009, pp. 32–53. [online] At: (Accessed on 03.04.19)

Marshall, J. (2005) ‘Connecting Art, Learning, and Creativity: A Case for Curriculum Integration’. In: Studies in Art Education, 46(3), 227-241. [online] At: (Accessed on 28.04.19)

Matherne, S. (2016) ‘Kant’s Theory of the Imagination’ In: The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. [online] At: (Accessed on 04.28.19)

McNally, M., Rathi, D., Evaniew, J., & Wu, Y. (2017) ‘Thematic Analysis of Eight Canadian Federal Broadband Programs from 1994 to 2016’ In: Journal of Information Policy, 7, 38-85. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.04.19)

Page, M. (2000) ‘Creativity and the Making of Contemporary Art’. In: Ede, S. (ed) Strange and Charmed. United Kingdom: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. pp. 104-119

Palmer, E. (2010). ‘”Slit Belly Swamp”: A Japanese Myth of the Origin of the Pleiades?’ In: Asian Ethnology, 69(2), 311-331. [online] At: (Accessed on 22.03.19)

PAYNE, W. (1894). ‘THE PLEIADES’. In: Scientific American, 71(14), 218-218. [online] At: (Accessed on 22.09.18)

Pfundstein, J. (2003). ‘Λαμπροὺϛ Δυνάσταϛ: Aeschylus, Astronomy and the Agamemnon’. In: The Classical Journal, 98(4), 397-410. [online] At: (Accessed on 22-03.19)

Pollack, B. (2011) ‘The Social Revolution’. In: Art News Online. [online] At: (Accessed 13.09.19)

Ramachandran, M. (1989). ‘Sense and Schmidentity’. In: The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 39(157), 463-471. [online] At: doi:10.2307/2219830 (Accessed on 10.03.19)

Renfrew, C. (2003) Figuring it out: The parallel Visions of Artists and Archeologists. London: Thames & Hudson.

Rhizome (2017) Net Art Anthology. [online] At: (Accessed on 09.13.19)

Russell, H. (1942). ‘New Pleiades’. In: Scientific American, 166(4), 180-181. [online] At: (Accessed on 05.04.19)

Scruton, R. (1974). ‘Art and Imagination’. In: Methuen & Co. [online] At: (Accessed on 13.09.18)

Seamon, D. (2010) Merleau-Ponty, Perception, and Environmental Embodiment: Implications for Architectural and Environmental Studies [online] At: (Accessed on 10.04.19)

Smithsonian Institute (n.d.) Smithsonian Guidelines for Accessible Exhibition Design [online] At: (Accessed on 09.09.18)

Solnit, R. (2014) The Encyclopedia of Trouble and Spaciousness. United States: Trinity University Press.

Tang Gallery, Skidmore College (2005) A Very Liquid Heaven. Athens: Lorem Press

Tweit, S. (2005). ‘The Pleiades’. In Graulich M. & Crumbley P. (eds.), Search For A Common Language: Environmental Writing And Education (pp. 149-162). Colorado: University Press of Colorado. [online] At: doi:10.2307/j.ctt4cgnmg.29 (Accessed on 14.09.18)

Vandenabeele, B. (2015) ‘The Sublime in Art: Kant, the Mannerist, and the Matterist Sublime’. In: The Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 49, no. 3, 2015, pp. 32–49. [online] At: (Accessed on 10.04.19)

Viola, B (s.d.) Bill Viola Biography. At: (Accessed 28.04.19)

Ward, O. (2014). Ways of looking : how to experience contemporary art. London: Laurence King.

We Are Their Children. (1980) PBS Cosmos: A Personal Voyage. [television programme extract, online] At: (Accessed on 01.03.2019)